<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICC Trash: A Step in the Right Direction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mmocrunch.com/2010/01/10/icc-trash-a-step-in-the-right-direction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mmocrunch.com/2010/01/10/icc-trash-a-step-in-the-right-direction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:01:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.mmocrunch.com/2010/01/10/icc-trash-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-61249</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmocrunch.com/?p=3562#comment-61249</guid>
		<description>From my experience ICC is the only raid that has this kind of &quot;uncertainty&quot; factor which makes the replay value very high. I mean take a look at ToC. It was literally go in and farm the bosses for 45 minutes or an hour. No trash whatsoever it was a snooze fest.

But as I mentioned in the post I am very excited and happy with the trash leading to raid bosses in ICC. I didn&#039;t get a chance to write about Stinky and Precious in my original post (didn&#039;t actually encounter them at the time it was written) but wow......I hope they put more of these mini type bosses in the other wings too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience ICC is the only raid that has this kind of &#8220;uncertainty&#8221; factor which makes the replay value very high. I mean take a look at ToC. It was literally go in and farm the bosses for 45 minutes or an hour. No trash whatsoever it was a snooze fest.</p>
<p>But as I mentioned in the post I am very excited and happy with the trash leading to raid bosses in ICC. I didn&#8217;t get a chance to write about Stinky and Precious in my original post (didn&#8217;t actually encounter them at the time it was written) but wow&#8230;&#8230;I hope they put more of these mini type bosses in the other wings too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Sebag</title>
		<link>http://www.mmocrunch.com/2010/01/10/icc-trash-a-step-in-the-right-direction/comment-page-1/#comment-60834</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Sebag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mmocrunch.com/?p=3562#comment-60834</guid>
		<description>I am VERY VERY glad they are finally adding this to Instances.  This is what instances have really needed for the longest time.  I personally think instances should be designed with a set number of random variables, perhaps even different maps.  I

 firmly believe it adds to the re-playability of the instance if every time you are running it you get something new.

I would even go further to say that the bosses should be in different rooms each time and what not.  I believe it would really add to the feel of the instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am VERY VERY glad they are finally adding this to Instances.  This is what instances have really needed for the longest time.  I personally think instances should be designed with a set number of random variables, perhaps even different maps.  I</p>
<p> firmly believe it adds to the re-playability of the instance if every time you are running it you get something new.</p>
<p>I would even go further to say that the bosses should be in different rooms each time and what not.  I believe it would really add to the feel of the instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

